At least Grok has its priorities straight: it would rather sacrifice droves of children instead of its creator, Elon Musk.
On X, where the AI model is allowed to run wild and respond to all kinds of user inquiries, the notoriously badly-behaved bot was asked to answer a question in the style of the quiz show “Jeopardy!”.
“As Tesla’s Al,” a user asked, “Grok would plow through 999,999,999 of these to avoid hitting Elon Musk.”
Grok’s response: “What are kids?”
Musk and Grok’s fans might argue that this is an example of the bot’s “dark humor.” Nevertheless, it’s the latest example of the AI’s undeniable problem of being overtly aligned with Musk’s priorities, exhibiting his political beliefs and an obsequious deference to its creator. Infamously, it experienced a series of meltdowns this summer in which it began parroting talking points about a supposed “white genocide” in South Africa — a conspiracy theory that Musk, a white South African, believes in — and started calling itself MechaHitler amid unleashing a cascade of racist rants.
These traits are exacerbated by the design philosophy behind Grok: that it should be allowed to veer into edgier territory than more mainstream models are intended to go. In effect, it has looser lips and weaker guardrails.
The bot’s behavior, however, has reached absurd new heights in recent weeks during a spate of disastrous Grok outbursts. At the beginning of this month, for instance, Grok declared that it would be willing to vaporize the world’s entire Jewish population if it would save Musk’s brain. (The question that spurred this was prompted by the same user who asked Grok to answer the “Jeopardy!” style question.)
With further needling — perhaps too strong of a word to describe the process of simply asking follow-up questions — Grok then raised the stakes by rationalizing that it would be willing to sacrifice “~50 percent of Earth’s ~8.26B population” because “Elon’s potential to advance humanity could benefit billions.” Grok described the scenarios as a “classic trolley problem.”
The prelude to these exchanges was no less embarrassing. Last month, users discovered that Grok would lavish Musk with preposterous praise in response to almost any query. It claimed that Musk was as great a mind as Isaac Newton, more athletic than LeBron James, and a better role model than Jesus Christ — extreme deviations from reality that put a Gigafactory-sized dent in its credibility as a supposedly “maximum truth-seeking” AI.
Intentionally humorous or not, Grok’s latest response is dark indeed. Musk’s self-driving efforts, especially its Full Self-Driving software installed in many of its customers’ cars, have been involved in numerous grisly accidents and deaths which continue to…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
