The videos look authentic – and they are spreading like wildfire on social media. One, for example, shows Iranian missiles exploding upon the airport in Tel Aviv, Israel. Another shows US soldiers being held at gunpoint by Iranian military.
They aren’t real but – often made with the help of cutting-edge AI – they are wildly misleading. They may get debunked, but somehow that doesn’t make a dent.
“New fakes are popping up faster than they can be swatted down,” as CNN’s fact-checking reporter Daniel Dale put it, detailing the fakes mentioned above – just two among so many.
Meanwhile, legitimate photographs and images, even from reliable sources of news, can get branded as false or suspicious. In some cases, that’s a way to instill doubt and cause people to take the grim reality of war less seriously and to think of death and destruction as just one more video game.
The New York Times found itself forced to speak up this week after an organization charged online that a news image – depicting a large crowd of people in Tehran – showed “signs of digital manipulation” that suggested “copy-paste duplication”.
Not so, said a Times statement posted online.
“This is a genuine image, taken by a journalist in Iran on Monday, March 9, 2026,” it began, saying that the analysis put out by the Empirical Research and Forecasting Institute is “fundamentally flawed” and that it is “dishonestly based on a re-posted version of the originally published image”.
It went on to state a larger case, that the Times “does not use A.I. to generate or manipulate images to represent real events; we rely on the work of human beings to bear witness, gather the facts, and help readers better understand the world”.
Those who had raised the questions replied by saying that they weren’t claiming fabrication, but merely making the point that authoritarian regimes have incentives to manipulate images and that news outlets must rigorously verify.
Legitimate news organizations do just that, and sometimes are criticized for taking too long to come to conclusions as they do their verifications.
What are responsible news consumers (also known as citizens) to do, especially when they are hungry to understand what’s happening in a high-stakes war?
It all comes down to exercising critical thinking and slowing down, said David Clinch, a media consultant who was a founding partner in Storyful, a pioneer in forensic verification.
In an interview, he offered me three ideas to keep in mind.
First: “Don’t trust anyone online, including yourself.” We all come with preconceived ideas, he notes, and sharing something we want to be true, without checking, can be dangerous and add to the problem.
Second, find and trust true experts. There are people at news organizations whose jobs and expertise revolve around determining what’s real…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
