The Delhi High Court on May 29, 2026, granted an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining M/s MakeMyIndiaTrip — a travel services website operating at www.makemyindiatrip.com — from using the name, domain, email IDs, and social media accounts bearing the impugned mark, finding that it was deceptively similar to the registered trademark of MakeMyTrip (India) Private Limited. Justice Jyoti Singh held that the mere addition of the word “India” was insufficient to distinguish the infringing mark from the plaintiff’s well-established registered trademark.
The court held that these actions constitute infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The plaintiff was directed to comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC within two weeks. The matter is listed before the court on October 6, 2026.
Court’s Finding: Justice Jyoti Singh found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case on multiple counts. The court noted that the rival trademarks were visually, structurally, and conceptually similar; the services offered by both parties were identical; and the consumer base overlapped entirely. The court observed that any person encountering both marks would be susceptible to initial interest confusion, point-of-sale confusion, and post-sale confusion.
Delhi HC further found that the adoption of the impugned marks appeared to be in bad faith, intended to create a false affiliation with the plaintiff’s registered mark. It held that the plaintiff’s formidable goodwill and reputation—built over more than 26 years—would be diluted and eroded if the defendant’s use of the impugned marks were allowed to continue. The balance of convenience, the court concluded, lay firmly in favour of the plaintiff (MakeMyTrip), who would suffer irreparable harm without the injunction.
How the infringement came to light: MakeMyTrip discovered the alleged infringement in the first week of March 2026 during a routine internet check. The investigation revealed that the defendant had adopted the name “MakeMyIndiaTrip” and was operating a website closely modeling the structure, presentation, and service format of MakeMyTrip’s platform. The defendant’s site offered international and domestic travel packages, group tours, car rentals, travel itineraries, and booking services in a manner strikingly similar to the plaintiff’s. The defendant was also found to be actively advertising on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube under the impugned marks.
Procedural aspects: The suit was filed as CS(COMM) 650/2026 along with several interlocutory applications. Justice Jyoti Singh disposed of all ancillary applications at the first hearing itself:
Why this matters: The injunction against MakeMyIndiaTrip reflects the Delhi High Court’s increasingly strict approach to trademark protection in the digital environment. Days earlier, the court issued a significant ruling in a dispute between Hindware and Google regarding the…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
