Indie Hollywood darling A24 scored a massive financial hit with its “Backrooms” horror flick this year, netting over $330 million globally on a minuscule $10 million budget — the studio’s highest-grossing film of all time.
The movie’s director Kane Parsons, a 21-year-old YouTuber-turned-filmmaker, is an outspoken critic of AI, calling it “genuinely harmful” to creativity.
“We already live in a world where you walk outside and there are billboards and signs that are obvious AI slop,” he told Deadline earlier this month. “That’s become part of our visual reality. To me, generative AI feels less like innovation than a symptom of a broader cultural and economic rot.”
Then, a revelation so shocking it was fit for an A24 feature: last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Google was investing $75 million in A24 as part of a research partnership with the goal of creating new AI tools for movie production — a bombshell development that had fans in a full-on meltdown.
The reaction shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. The use of generative AI in the entertainment industry has been a lightning rod, with high-profile creatives, including Parsons, loudly voicing their opposition to the tech. A concurrent public AI backlash has turned fans into an angry mob — and it’s clear that A24 wasn’t prepared for the sustained backlash.
“Maybe we just have to accept that the A24 era is over,” reads a widely circulating post on the A24 subreddit. “Indie studios come and go. Like Miramax and New Line Cinema before them, A24 was always destined to be consumed by corporate interest.”
“I don’t know that this Google partnership will necessarily be the death of the studio, but if it is something else will replace it,” the author wrote.
Meanwhile, A24 has been trying to pick up the pieces as its most loyal fans lead a revolt online.
“This is a research partnership,” communications head Sophia Shin told Wired. “We’re working side-by-side with DeepMind’s researchers to learn, iterate, and build, having an active hand in shaping new tools and workflows.”
“Our relationship with our audience is something we don’t take for granted,” she added. “This partnership exists because we want to dictate what tools get built for artists, and so they have a voice in shaping them rather than having tools handed to them.”
“We’d rather have a seat at the table than on the sidelines,” Shin concluded.
Unsurprisingly, the fan community did not take kindly to the company’s attempt to patch things up.
“Why do artists need a voice in shaping tools they should never have any intention of using?” one user tweeted.
“The table has six legs,” one Reddit user wrote mockingly in response to Shin’s comments, a reference to early…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
