Shadow arts minister says AI companies need to do what everyone else does: ‘ask permission and pay for it’
Dan Jervis-Bardy
The shadow minister for the arts, Angie Bell, who was a professional musician for 35 years, has said strong copyright protections are essential to ensure Australian creators were “respected, rewarded and able to continue to produce world-class work”. She said:
If AI companies want to use Australian creative work, they should do what everyone else does: ask permission and pay for it. That’s how copyright works, and that’s how it should stay.
Australian creativity is one of our greatest national assets – not a free resource for multinational tech companies. The Coalition will always back the right of artists to control their work and be fairly compensated when others profit from it.
This is about consent, fairness and respect for Australian creativity.
Guardian Australia is among the media companies supporting the campaign to safeguard copyright laws.
Key events
Tory Shepherd
Harmful online content? Not our problem, X says
When Elon Musk’s X Corp (formerly Twitter) was asked what sort of “harmful experiences or content” digital platforms should stop allowing Australian kids to see, it said “none”.
The federal infrastructure department put out a survey at the end of last year to gauge what people thought about having a digital duty of care, which would make social media platforms take steps to stop foreseeable harm.
At the royal commission into antisemitism this morning, counsel assisting Richard Lancaster asked the department’s first assistant secretary Sarah Vandenbroek about the survey:
The first question was: ‘Which of the following kinds of harmful experiences or content do you think digital platforms should take steps to prevent for young Australians under 18 years?’
And then there’s a series of harmful forms of online content.
And X Corp ticked the box ‘none of the above’?
“Yes,” Vandenbroek said.
Lancaster then took her to a similar question, but this one was about adults. He said.
This is again a series of boxes that are available to be checked for various types of online hate speech and violent pornography and content that promotes seriously harmful behaviour. And again, X Corp ticked ‘none of the above’.
It was a “disappointing” response, Vandenbroek said.
Earlier, Vandenbroek agreed with Lancaster there was a financial incentive for social platforms to “promote or acquiesce in the spread of harmful content online because it is likely to be or more likely to be controversial or shared or commented on” because they rely on eyeballs to attract advertising.
Jack Snape
Socceroos ‘prepared’ to face Egypt’s Mo Salah
The Socceroos are set to face Mo Salah in their last 32 match, though uncertainty hangs over whether…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
