The Delhi High Court on Tuesday declined to grant immediate relief to Indian cricketer Abhishek Sharma in his suit seeking protection of his personality rights and removal of allegedly AI-generated and defamatory online content, after finding discrepancies in the material placed before it, according to a report by Bar and Bench.
Justice Jyoti Singh directed Sharma to file an additional affidavit with screenshots that correctly match the URLs listed in the case record and posted the matter for hearing on July 9.
Questioning the inconsistencies, the court said, “There is a real mess up here. You file an affidavit with screenshot matching with your table. Screenshot is way different from what you are showing. I cannot pass an order like this.” The judge added, “I am not saying I am not inclined to but I cannot pass an order this way.”
Dispute over AI-generated posts and personality rights: Sharma has sought the removal of online content that he claims misuses his name, image and identity, including AI-generated material that allegedly harms his reputation. His counsel argued that one post altered a genuine photograph of the cricketer with his manager using artificial intelligence to falsely portray her as his girlfriend.
Appearing for Meta, Advocate Varun Pathak told the court that two of the eight URLs cited by Sharma were no longer accessible. He also argued that one of the remaining posts appeared to be paparazzi content and may not amount to a personality rights violation.
During the hearing, the court also discussed the overlap between personality rights and defamation in cases involving manipulated online content. Meta argued that defamatory content and personality rights are separate legal issues and warned against expanding personality rights to cover all objectionable online material. The platform also submitted that the list of allegedly infringing links had grown from about 25 URLs to nearly 4,000, making compliance increasingly difficult.
Recent ruling on similar issue: The case comes days after the Delhi High Court dealt with a similar plea by Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha over AI-generated and deepfake content. In that case, the Court refused to grant blanket protection under personality rights, holding that not all allegedly harmful online content amounts to a personality rights violation and that public figures must tolerate satire within legal limits, while directing the removal of specific content it found defamatory.
Read more:
- Bombay HC protects Shilpa Shetty’s personality rights, orders takedown of deepfakes and infringing content
- Fake Allu Arjun AI chatbots still live despite Delhi HC order in personality rights case
- Can an AI chatbot ‘be’ Shilpa Shetty without her consent? Bombay HC questions
The post Delhi HC defers cricketer Abhishek Sharma’s personality rights plea over missing evidence appeared first on MEDIANAMA.
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
