Update, October 28, 12:30 PM: On October 27, the Supreme Court further asked all states and Union Territories to provide details of cyber arrest cases in their jurisdictions by November 3, 2025.
On October 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of India took suo motu cognisance of a case in which scammers allegedly defrauded a senior citizen couple from Ambala of Rs 1.05 crore through a “digital arrest” scheme. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi heard the matter.
According to the complaint received by the Court on September 21, 2025, the couple was contacted by persons posing as officials of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and judicial authorities. Furthermore, the fraudsters allegedly displayed forged Supreme Court orders over video calls and messaging applications to compel the victims to transfer funds between September 3 and 16, 2025.
After reviewing the complaint, the Bench issued notices to the Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation, the Government of Haryana through its Home Department, and the Superintendent of Police, Cyber Crime, Ambala. The Court also requested the Attorney General of India to assist in the proceedings.
Additionally, it directed the Ambala Cyber Crime Branch to file a status report before the next hearing scheduled for October 27, 2025.
What did the Supreme Court say?
The Supreme Court noted that the fraudsters had fabricated a series of official-looking documents, including a purported “Freeze Order” dated September 3, 2025, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), an “Arrest Order” bearing the seal of the Enforcement Directorate, and a “Surveillance Order” with forged judicial signatures. It also observed that the accused had produced fictitious proceedings before the Bombay High Court and claimed false investigations by the CBI and the ED.
The Bench stated that such acts went far beyond ordinary cybercrime, emphasising that “the forgery of documents and the brazen criminal misuse of the name, seal, and judicial authority of this Court or a High Court is a matter of grave concern”.
Additionally, the judges remarked that fabricating judicial orders with forged signatures of judges “strikes at the very foundation of public trust in the judicial system, besides the rule of law”, calling it a “direct assault on the dignity and majesty of this institution”.
Advertisements
Furthermore, the Court noted that this was not an isolated incident and acknowledged that “responsible media” had reported similar frauds across several states. It directed authorities to take stern action on a “pan-India basis” and urged central and state police to coordinate their efforts.
Why This Matters
The decision of the Supreme Court of India to take suo motu cognisance of matters ,as it aligns with a broader surge in cyber offences in…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
