To curb music piracy, the Delhi High Court has targeted stream-ripping websites that enable users to download media files from streaming platforms like YouTube. Justice Tejas Karia directed the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and internet service providers to block sites such as SSYouTube, YT.SaveTube, Y2Down, and others.
The court also asked the domain registrars that enable the operation of these stream-ripping sites to provide the Basic Subscriber Information of their owners, including names, email addresses, contact numbers, IP logs, and registration details.
Justice Karia stated that these stream-ripping websites “deliberately aim to infringe copyrighted works.” He explained that stream ripping allows users to extract and download audio from streamed videos, noting that this can be done through websites, mobile apps, browser extensions, or standalone software that pull media from licensed streaming platforms in real time.
What is the case:
Saregama India has filed a lawsuit against a large group of websites that provide “stream ripping” services, websites that allow users to convert YouTube or other streaming videos into downloadable MP3/MP4 files.
The court noted that YouTube’s Terms of Service prohibit users from accessing, reproducing, downloading, distributing, transmitting, broadcasting, displaying, selling, licensing, altering, modifying, or otherwise interfering with any part of the service, including its security features. It held that stream-ripping platforms blatantly violate these contractual restrictions.
Among other works, Saregama cited the following songs, currently available to stream on YouTube, as copyrighted content protected under the Copyright Act:
- “Premalo” from Court
- “Hey Rangule” from Amaran (Telugu)
- “Tauba Tauba” from Bad Newz
The application has been filed under Section 80(2) of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), seeking an exemption from issuing a notice to Defendant No. 46, the DoT, by submitting videos of the alleged infringing activities by these stream-ripping sites. An individual may file an urgent petition against the government or a public officer without issuing prior notice, subject to the court’s approval. However, the court cannot grant relief until the government or the officer responds, and if the court finds the matter is not urgent, it will return the case and require the standard notice process.
As part of the proceedings, the court noted that Saregama earns revenue by licensing its copyrighted sound recordings, musical compositions, and lyrical works to major digital streaming platforms, including YouTube, Spotify, Apple Music, Gaana, JioSaavn, and Amazon Music. It also licenses content to television channels for serials, reality shows, and promotional materials, as well as to advertising agencies for use in commercials across TV, radio, digital, and social media. Additionally, the company licenses its works to production…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
