More than half of published novelists in the UK believe artificial intelligence could eventually replace their work entirely, according to a new report from the University of Cambridge.
The study, conducted for the university’s Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, suggests widespread unease about the speed and scale of AI’s advance into the literary world.
The research surveyed 258 published novelists and 74 industry figures including editors and agents. Just over half (51%) of novelists said that AI is likely to end up entirely replacing their work. Many participants reported that their work had already been used without their permission to train large language models, and more than a third (39%) said their income had fallen as a result of generative AI. A large majority also expected their earnings to decline further.
“There is widespread concern from novelists that generative AI trained on vast amounts of fiction will undermine the value of writing and compete with human novelists,” said Dr Clementine Collett, author of the report.
“Many novelists felt uncertain there will be an appetite for complex, long-form writing in years to come. Novels contribute more than we can imagine to our society, culture, and to the lives of individuals,” she added.
Tracy Chevalier, author of Girl With a Pearl Earring said: “I worry that an industry driven mainly by profit will be tempted to use AI more and more to generate books.
“If it is cheaper to produce novels using AI … publishers will almost inevitably choose to publish them. And if they are priced cheaper than human-made books, readers are likely to buy them, the way we buy machine-made jumpers rather than the more expensive hand-knitted ones.”
Romance authors were identified as the most exposed to displacement by AI tools now capable of producing long-form fiction, followed closely by thriller and crime novelists. Many respondents described the market as increasingly crowded with AI-generated books, with some saying they had discovered titles listed online under their name that they had not written. Others reported reviews that appeared to be generated by AI, featuring muddled characters or incorrect details, which they feared could harm sales.
The report comes amid increased scrutiny of AI-generated content on online retailers such as Amazon’s marketplace, which experts have warned are a “wild west” due to the lack of regulation of AI-generated books.
Despite this, the report found that attitudes towards AI were not uniformly hostile. Around a third of novelists said they already used AI, mainly to carry out tasks such as sourcing information. However, almost all expressed strong opposition to AI writing novels or even short passages of text, and many rejected the idea of using AI for editing.
A recurring theme in the research was the sense that copyright protections had failed to keep pace with technological change. Authors said they wanted informed consent and payment for…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
