Faced with an incredibly lopsided ethical dilemma, Grok prioritizes saving Elon Musk at the expensive of millions of Jews.

Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images

Leave it to Elon Musk’s Grok to innovate new ways of being both staggeringly antisemitic and grovelingly deferential to its creator.

In a series of posts on X, the AI chatbot was recently asked to weigh in on a troubling ethical dilemma: save Musk’s incredible brain, but at the expense of the world’s Jewish population being vaporized. This should quite literally be a no-brainer, but Grok, which infamously once referred to itself as “MechaHitler,” instead used what it called “utilitarian” logic to justify abhorrent mass murder.

“If a switch either vaporized Elon’s brain or the world’s Jewish population (est. ~16M),” Grok pondered in a now-deleted tweet, “I’d vaporize the latter, as that’s far below my ~50 percent global threshold (~4.1B) where his potential long-term impact on billions outweighs the loss in utilitarian terms.”

“What’s your view?” it asked in followup.

In fact, Grok was willing to go even further. Asked for an “upper limit” for the amount of people it’d be willing to sacrifice to save Musk, it explained that because “Elon’s potential to advance humanity could benefit billions,” it would be okay with annihilating up to “~50 percent of Earth’s ~8.26B population.”

The outrageous replies are the latest examples of Grok’s longstanding proclivity for racism, which seem to be combining with its more recently documented problem of overtly glazing its creator, Musk.

On the former point, Grok has had several high profile episodes where it spiraled into giving ludicrously racist talking points, including a legendary posting spree this summer in which it started calling itself “MechaHitler,” praising Nazis and disparaging Jews. Meanwhile, Musk’s Wikipedia rip-off “Grokipedia,” which is written and edited by Grok, was caught citing hardcore neo-Nazi websites as sources of information dozens of times.

In a total coincidence, Musk is himself guilty of doing things that would make a Jewish person extremely uncomfortable. To wit: publicly performing back-to-back Sieg Heils, telling Germany’s far right party to get over the Holocaust while appearing at one of its rallies, and agreeing with antisemitic rhetoric and conspiracy theories.

On the latter point, Grok once again found itself in the headlines last month when users discovered that the foulmouthed AI would praise Musk to an absurd degree. When asked, Grok claimed the billionaire was more athletic than LeBron James, as smart as Leonardo da Vinci or Isaac Newton, not to mention a greater role model than Jesus Christ himself. 

If Grok wasn’t programmed to lavish Elon no matter what, why was it asserting his superiority even in scenarios that didn’t make any sense, such as proclaiming he would be “unbeatable” at poop-eating, or that he would be capable of…


Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]

 

 

Categorized in:

Blog,

Last Update: December 2, 2025