While AI companies continue to command the global economy and pour billions of dollars into building data centers, it’s still not even clear that their products can deliver on one of their core premises: increasing productivity.
One big skeptic of the tech’s economic promises is vice president and principal analyst at the global market analytics firm JP Gownder, who says we’re simply “not seeing” an AI-driven boost to productivity in any of the available data.
“You begin to get the picture that information technology isn’t measured always in as linear a way into productivity as people assume,” he told The Register in a new interview. “It just isn’t there.”
This isn’t a statement on how transformative AI might or might not be. It could have massive effects without necessarily translating to economic gains, a phenomenon known as the Solow Paradox, named after the Nobel Prize winning economist Robert Solow who correctly predicted “that by 1987 the effects of the PC revolution can be seen everywhere, except in the productivity statistics,” in Gownder’s analysis.
He pointed to data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics showing how between 1947 to 1973 — before the advent of PCS — productivity improved by 2.7 percent annually, but only 2.1 percent between 1990 and 2001, once PCs had hit the mainstream.
“So despite all those PCs, it was a lot lower,” Gownder said. “And [from] 2007 to 2019 it was 1.5 percent.”
Mountains of research as well as cases of workplace deployment of AI have suggested that the tech is far from being ready for primetime. One notable MIT study found that 95 percent of companies that integrated AI saw zero meaningful growth in revenue. For coding tasks, one of AI’s most widely hyped applications, another study showed that programmers who used AI coding tools actually became slower at their jobs.
AIs designed to automate entire tasks aren’t looking too hot either: when researchers at the Center for AI Safety tested AI agents’ ability to complete remote work tasks, not a single model was able to complete more than three percent of their assignments. The very introduction of AI into the workplace appears to be disastrous for employee relations, suggests another study, which found that AI resulted in employees passing off low quality “workslop” with the expectation that someone else down the line would polish the AI’s shoddy output.
“A lot of generative AI stuff isn’t really working,” Gownder told The Register. “And I’m not just talking about your consumer experience, which has its own gaps, but the MIT study that suggested that 95 percent of all generative AI projects are not yielding a tangible [profit and loss] benefit. So no actual [return on investment.]”
“It is just further context that says we’re not at a place where lots and…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
