- Access the court order from here
A Delhi court on Tuesday heard an appeal filed by finance news platform Moneylife against a trial court order that directed the removal and de-indexing of its reports and videos linked to businessman Manoj Sandesara, his family, and the Sterling Biotech bank fraud case. District Judge Sunil Choudhary at Tis Hazari Courts recorded Sandesara’s undertaking that he would not make any further takedown requests during the proceedings. The court will next hear the matter on July 14.
Moneylife Challenges ‘Dynamic Injunction’: Moneylife has challenged a May 16 order passed by a senior civil judge in Sandesara’s suit against Google LLC and others. The order restrained the publication from publishing or circulating further content linking Sandesara and his family to Sterling Biotech and alleged bank fraud. It also directed the de-indexing and de-referencing of specified URLs, along with “such other links not known to the Plaintiff.”
In its appeal, Moneylife argued that the order goes far beyond specific URLs and effectively blocks future reporting on a matter of public interest. It said the court had allowed a form of “dynamic injunction” without any legal basis in defamation law and failed to identify which exact statements in its reports were allegedly false, defamatory, or malicious.
The publication also argued that the trial court did not apply the Supreme Court’s standards for granting pre-trial gag orders in defamation matters, laid down in Bloomberg Television Production Services India v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises. According to the appeal, the order infringes constitutional protections relating to free speech and press freedom.
How the Dispute Started: The dispute began with an ex parte order passed by a Delhi civil court in April, which directed Google, Meta, and other platforms to remove and de-index content related to Sandesara and the Sterling Biotech case within 36 hours. The court relied on the “right to be forgotten,” observing that continued circulation of old reports could damage Sandesara’s reputation after criminal proceedings against the family were closed following a Rs 5,100 crore settlement recorded by the Supreme Court in 2025.
Moneylife and its co-founder, Sucheta Dalal, soon challenged the order, arguing that the court passed the injunction without hearing the publication and allowed takedowns against unnamed media organisations through its “John Doe” directions. In April, another Delhi court dismissed an earlier appeal filed by Moneywise Media LLP, holding that it was premature because the trial court proceedings were still pending.
Background of the Sterling Biotech Case: The Sterling Biotech case stems from allegations of bank fraud of around Rs 5,383 crore involving Sterling Biotech Limited and companies linked to the Sandesara family. The CBI registered the case in 2017, while the Enforcement Directorate later attached assets in…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
