Telegram’s “unique platform architecture”, including its bot ecosystem, mirror channels and anonymity-enhancing features, was the Centre’s core defence of the temporary blocking order before the Delhi High Court on Thursday. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that Telegram’s design allows unlawful activity to rapidly re-emerge despite takedown efforts, while Attorney General R. Venkataramani contended that a platform unable to effectively address risks arising from its own architecture could not rely solely on proportionality arguments.
A single-judge vacation bench of Justice Tejas Karia reserved judgment in Telegram’s challenge to the June 16 blocking order and directed both parties to file submissions by 7 pm on June 18. The order blocks Telegram in India until June 22, ahead of the June 21 NEET-UG re-examination, and separately requires the platform to disable editing of previously sent messages until June 30.
Telegram’s architecture and unique challenges: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that Telegram’s design itself creates challenges that do not exist on other platforms. Relying on Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) reports from 2024, 2025 and 2026, including a detailed report dated June 10, 2026, Mehta argued that Telegram possesses “certain technical and architectural features that distinguish it from other intermediaries” and “facilitate rapid dissemination and persistence of unlawful content despite takedown measures” while creating challenges for law enforcement agencies. He told the court that the reports consistently found Telegram’s architecture to be uniquely resistant to conventional enforcement measures.
According to the government, Telegram’s architecture enables unlawful activity to quickly reappear even after enforcement action. Among the features cited by the Centre were:
- A single account’s ability to create multiple bots;
- Mirror bots that can be recreated within minutes;
- Username-based communication that conceals user identities;
- Cloud-based storage and synchronisation, along with deletion of user data; and
- Large public channels with up to 2 lakh members.
Government highlights bots on Telegram: “In Telegram, one account user can create 40 bots,” the Solicitor General argued, pointing out that WhatsApp allows only one per user. He further submitted that this encourages the multiplication of unlawful activity. “The removal and/or disabling of a particular bot does not necessarily eliminate the underlying unlawful activity,” he said. “Mirror bots having identical functionality, content and objectives can be recreated within minutes under different names or identifiers.”
At another point, he claimed that blocked users could rapidly migrate to replacement channels. “Once the bot is blocked, it is redirected to another mirror bot,” he said. Justice Karia interjected to clarify whether such migration could happen automatically….
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
