The AI ethicist Eleanor Drage believes that to thrive alongside artificial intelligence, humans need to recognise AI’s “humanity”. She means that while we often speak of AI as though it were some mystical, formless thing, it is the product of hours of human labour, in silicon and quartz mines, microchip factories and data labelling centres. If citizens want to wrest power from the tech companies that are building AI, it helps to understand clearly what they are selling us. This also means seeing through the marketing and hype: “the cloud”, that nebulous, distant place where your photos are stored, is just someone else’s computer; an AI “hallucination” is a system error or data labelling mistake; intelligence is a very broad – and potentially misleading – term.
The story in Silicon Valley is that AI will either save us, ushering in a new era of prosperity and human longevity, or it will wipe us all out. Drage argues, convincingly, that big tech cannot possibly deliver on its utopian promises while it continues to chase profit and power above all else, and while it serves the interests of a narrow few. Meanwhile, the cultural obsession with the AI-induced apocalypse conveniently redirects attention from the practical conversations we could be having about how to make AI safer – by ensuring citizens have more power over how their information is used, and how AI models are trained and regulated, for example. Tech titans’ apocalyptic visions also create the false impression that AI safety is more important than climate change, geopolitical tensions and inequality, three problems that are already causing a huge amount of suffering and that, if addressed, would reduce many AI-linked risks too.
Drage, an assistant research professor at the University of Cambridge’s Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, has conducted research that debunks AI-powered recruitment processes, and exposes the dangers of incorporating AI into law enforcement. Many of her criticisms of big tech will be familiar: that AI algorithms perpetuate and entrench pre-existing biases; that for all their bland, generic promises to be “transparent” and “accountable”, tech giants have become too big to care about ethics; that a handful of executives have amassed far too much power; and that the rollout of AI is happening without our consent and without consideration for planetary health. But her writing has intellectual heft, and her philosophical explorations of, for example, how we define intelligence and why this matters, are very interesting.
Occasionally, however, Drage’s arguments seem rushed and become sloppy. “It’s merely an illusion that the labour force is disappearing: work is simply shifting, from artists to data labellers and from marketeers to engineers,” she writes at one point. But it’s not clear that artists and “marketeers” will become redundant in the coming AI era. It’s also not as though the data labellers…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
