A man who posted non-consensual, pornified “deepfake” images of Australian women has been ordered to pay $343,500 in civil penalties for doing so by a federal court. Everyone, everywhere, should be thrilled by this decision.
What Anthony Rotondo did by uploading these images was perpetrate “image-based abuse” against his victims. It’s a wanton, wilful act of cruelty intended to harm and humiliate its targets, and it is against Australian law.
The case against Rotondo was initially brought by Australia’s online regulator, the eSafety commissioner, two years ago.
Before any brain-rotted internet apologist decides to leap in with the usual excuses for boys being boys, mistakes being made and girls being fair game, please note: when eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, issued a removal notice for the content, Rotondo claimed it meant nothing to him, and told her to get a warrant.
When a court subsequently did order Rotondo to remove the images and not to share them, his response was to email them to 50 addresses, including to Inman Grant herself.
The capacity for nastiness will ever flow and spread in poorly regulated spaces.
So it’s a relief that the court heeded the regulator’s recommendation that a significant penalty be imposed on Rotondo to practically – and culturally – discourage foul dickhead behaviour before it metastasises into something far worse than mere problematic scale.
Social normalisation.
I wrote in June last year of the shameful incident at Bacchus Marsh grammar school in which a teenage boy was arrested, and released with a caution, after 50 female students discovered deepfake pornographic images of themselves. A parent who happened to see the material threw up when she did.
Australians were so horrified, anti-deepfake legislation enjoyed bipartisan support and a speedy passage through the parliament.
In the wake of the hefty fine on Rotondo, let’s pop corks. Let’s throw confetti. In an internet-dominated world where vain techlords rule us by whim, sovereign governments seem reduced to the role of rearguard guerrillas.
This enforcement of law in Australia feels like the escape from Mos Eisley, if not yet the successful attack on the Death Star. Chalk up two skirmishes won by the local rebels, given Australia’s hugely popular ban on social media for children is also reminding governments that they might, actually, be able to spring Leia from Vader’s clutches if they try.
European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, praised the ban after Albanese’s recent speech about it at the UN. “Inspired by Australia’s example,” she said “we in Europe are watching and will be learning from you.”
Could courage be contagious? Let’s hope so, because in the absence of powerful regulation, the online normalisation of awful blooms like candida that itches as it cripples, and becomes increasingly difficult to shift.
Dare I remind everyone there was a time when trolls lived only in folktales, lies did not…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
