Security Operations Centers (SOC) today are overwhelmed. Analysts handle thousands of alerts every day, spending much time chasing false positives and adjusting detection rules reactively. SOCs often lack the environmental context and relevant threat intelligence needed to quickly verify which alerts are truly malicious. As a result, analysts spend excessive time manually triaging alerts, the majority of which are classified as benign.
Addressing the root cause of these blind spots and alert fatigue isn’t as simple as implementing more accurate tools. Many of these traditional tools are very accurate, but their fatal flaw is a lack of context and a narrow focus – missing the forest for the trees. Meanwhile, sophisticated attackers exploit exposures invisible to traditional reactive tools, often evading detection using widely-available bypass kits.
While all of these tools are effective in their own right, they often fail because of the reality that attackers don’t employ just one attack technique, exploit just one type of exposure or weaponize a single CVE when breaching an environment. Instead, attackers chain together multiple exposures, utilizing known CVEs where helpful, and employing evasion techniques to move laterally across an environment and accomplish their desired goals. Individually, traditional security tools may detect one or more of these exposures or IoCs, but without the context derived from a deeply integrated continuous exposure management program, it can be nearly impossible for security teams to effectively correlate otherwise seemingly disconnected signals.
SecOps Benefits at Every Stage of the Cybersecurity Lifecycle
Exposure management platforms can help transform SOC operations by weaving exposure intelligence directly into existing analyst workflows. Of course, having attack surface visibility and insight into interconnected exposures provides immense value, but that’s just scratching the surface. This really shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, given the significant overlap in the high-level models each team is operating, albeit often in parallel as opposed to working in tandem.
To make the point further, I’ve included a comparison below between a typical SOC workflow and the CTEM lifecycle:
| Typical SOC Lifecycle | How Integrated Exposure Management Helps | CTEM Lifecycle |
|---|---|---|
|
Monitor Maintain continuous visibility into the entire attack surface, prioritizing critical assets that matter most to the business and attackers are most likely to go after. |
Shared Attack Surface Visibility Integration with CMDB and SOC tooling creates a unified view of the attack surface and critical assets, aligning security and IT teams on what matters most. |
Scope Outline the scope of the exposure management program, identifying critical assets that matter most to the… |
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
