Amid the ongoing debate on whether the “fair dealing” exception on copyright infringement can be applied to the process of training AI models, a government committee has said that amending existing law will not help adequately protect the rights of content creators, nor will it reduce the legal exposure of AI developers.
“Amending the fair dealing provision under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957, will neither help strike a balance, nor will it effectively address the legal exposure of AI developers under copyright law,” the committee under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) said.
This comes at a time when the intersection of AI and copyright law has become a focal point of legal discourse. In the age of AI, one of the most pressing issues is whether AI-generated works can be protected under copyright law.
The Logic Behind the Committee’s Argument
Explaining the rationale behind its argument, the committee said that the fair dealing provision is primarily an “exception” to copyright infringement, in the nature of defence and not an enabling provision such as the exclusive rights provision of copyright owners under Section 14.
“From a jurisprudential point of view, intellectual property rights work as a two-way sword. On the one hand, there is a growing awareness that such protection is a sine qua-non of the motivational factor underlying the creation of an intellectual work; however, on the other hand, granting an absolute protection to the intellectual work can be detrimental to the further progress of humanity,” it argued.
Furthermore, protection under the fair dealing provision is contingent upon meeting specific criteria. First, the burden of proof lies with the person or entity seeking protection under the copyright law.
Secondly, assuming that the first requirement is met, the AI developer must also show that it only used the copyrighted material for specific purposes mentioned in the aforementioned clause, such as research, criticism or review, the reporting of current events and current affairs, among others.
“As a consequence, any legislative amendment to the fair dealing provision to facilitate AI training will not reduce the legal uncertainty faced by AI developers,” the committee said.
Govt Panel Proposes Blanket Licence for AI Developers
A committee under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) released a part of a working paper on the intersection of AI and copyright on Monday.
In its assessment, the committee found that content creators globally are demanding that the use of copyrighted material for training AI systems should be subject to “consent and compensation”. Further, they argue that allowing AI training on copyrighted works “without permission or fair remuneration poses an existential threat” to the creative industries.
On the other hand, the tech industry claims that training…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
