On Friday, May 8, 2026, The New York Times published a guest essay by investigative journalist Julia Angwin with a headline that demands attention: “Meta Is Dying.” She highlights that Meta lost daily active users in Q1 2026, falling from 3.58 billion in Q4 2025 to 3.56 billion.
Angwin sees this as the beginning of a long, slow decline, comparing the company’s trajectory to AOL in 2003 and Yahoo in 2015: technically alive, still profitable, but entering what she bluntly calls the “zombie era.”
She may be right. And if she is, Theodore Levitt told us exactly why this would happen, 66 years ago.
The Lesson Meta Never Learned
In 1960, Harvard Business School professor Theodore Levitt published “Marketing Myopia” in the Harvard Business Review. His central argument was that companies fail not because demand disappears, but because they define their business too narrowly. Railroads collapsed because they thought they were in the railroad business rather than the transportation business. Trolley car companies were replaced by automobiles they could have pioneered. “People don’t want a quarter-inch drill,” Levitt wrote. “They want a quarter-inch hole.”
Now look at Meta’s six major pivots over 22 years and ask: What business did Mark Zuckerberg actually think he was in?
In 2021, he declared the answer was “the metaverse business” – a bet whose Reality Labs division has since accumulated roughly $80 billion in operating losses. Users didn’t agree. In 2023, he pivoted to generative AI and has since committed over $100 billion to building models that, as Angwin notes, currently perform worse than the competition. Q1 2026 results show record revenue of $56.3 billion, up 33% year over year, but also $33.44 billion in total costs, a 35% increase, and an AI spending outlook that has rattled investors.
The revenue looks strong. The trajectory looks like a company that keeps pivoting to new product definitions while its core users quietly disengage.
What The Traffic Data Actually Shows
This is where opinion meets evidence, and the Similarweb traffic for March 2026 is instructive.
Google leads the world with 86.9 billion monthly visits. YouTube follows with 29.3 billion. Facebook comes in third at 11.9 billion, and Instagram comes in fourth at 7.1 billion. That gap between Google and Facebook, is the data equivalent of what Levitt was describing. Google defined itself as being in the information access business. Facebook defined itself as being in the social network business. One of those definitions scales indefinitely. The other runs out of room.
The AI category data is even more pointed. ChatGPT records 5.7 billion monthly visits globally, with year-over-year growth of 28.5%. Gemini is growing sharply at 283.8% YoY. Claude.ai jumped 423.7% to 613.7 million visits YoY.
Meta.ai does not appear in the top 100 most-visited websites.
Meta spent $100 billion entering the AI race. It is not winning it.
The Squeeze Play Angwin…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
