We have an expansive agenda for our roundtable on age verification and restricting social media access for children in India. The discussion will examine the policy rationale behind these proposals, how age verification systems could work in practice, the technical and enforcement challenges involved, and the legal and design alternatives to blanket restrictions.
- Date: Friday, 31 July 2026
- Time: 1 PM to 5 PM
- Venue: Viceroy Hall, The Claridges, New Delhi
Agenda:
- 12:30 – 1:00 PM: Lunch and networking
- 1:00 – 5:00 PM: Roundtable discussion
Note: This is an invite-only discussion, under Chatham House rules, so we’ll have to approve participation.
Here is the brief breakdown of the topics we will discuss in three broad segments at the roundtable (with breaks):
Impact of digital platforms on children: what are we optimising for?
- Gaps in understanding digital harms and benefits of social media.
- Access to knowledge, learning, and participation online.
- Impact on children without alternative access to information or education.
- Who decides what content or platforms are considered “harmful”?
- What should the evidentiary threshold for harm be?
- International approaches and lessons from Australia, Indonesia, and the Age Appropriate Design Code.
- What India can learn from global approaches to age verification.
- Platform design versus platform access: what causes greater harm?
- Children’s use of AI companions and conversational AI.
Technical implementation, models, and enforcement challenges:
- Technical and operational issues with age verification systems.
- Different verification models, where verification should happen, and who should conduct it.
- False positives (blocking legitimate users) and false negatives (children bypassing restrictions).
- Data collection implications and alignment with the DPDP Act.
- Implementation challenges in households with shared devices.
- Feasibility of implementing restrictions across state boundaries.
- Implications of building age verification infrastructure at scale.
- Standards for testing and certifying age assurance systems.
- Workarounds including VPNs, borrowed credentials, AI-based age estimation, and movement across encrypted and unencrypted platforms.
Balancing protection, agency, and policy design:
- Existing safety mechanisms and possible improvements.
- Age verification versus parental controls versus bans.
- Schools and digital literacy interventions.
- Enforcement responsibilities, penalties, and accountability mechanisms.
- Lessons from regulations that failed at the enforcement stage.
- The Centre’s proposed graded framework (8-12, 12-16, 16-18) and its implications for implementation and platform design.
- Centre-state jurisdictional and enforcement challenges.
- Graduated restrictions versus binary age-based bans.
- Measuring regulatory success and adapting policy over…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
