Google Search Advocate John Mueller responded to a plan to hide a homepage button from Google in hopes that a better-worded link further down the page would count instead. He suspects the person behind it is overthinking it.
The r/bigseo thread starts with a question about a homepage that links to the same services page twice. The first link is a ‘Services’ button near the top, while the second sits further down in an FAQ, worded the way the person wants Google to read it.
To get the second link to “win,” they plan to make the more prominent button stop being a link. It would still work when someone clicks it, but the page’s code wouldn’t call it a link anymore. That leaves the FAQ link as the only regular link on the page pointing to the services page.
They asked the thread whether it would make any visible difference.
What Mueller Said
Mueller replied in the thread:
“I suspect you’re overthinking it, Google has practice dealing with lots of websites so I wouldn’t expect you to see any visible change there.
That said, if you wanted to experiment with this, I’d suggest doing something more along the lines of using CSS / JS to position things on the page, regardless of where the link is placed in the HTML. That reduces the potential negative side-effects of “breaking” the HTML (turning links into buttons, or similar, ugh) while still letting you vary the position in your page’s HTML code.”
He didn’t say whether the first link wins. His answer is about the size of the effect and the cost of chasing it.
Why Anyone Would Try This
The idea behind the plan is called first link priority. It says that when one page links to another page twice, Google reads the words in the first link and ignores the second. If that were true, the button would win and the FAQ link would be wasted.
Google has never clearly defined “first link priority.” SEJ’s ranking factors chapter on first link priority traces the idea to a 2008 Rand Fishkin post and finds nothing to support treating it as a rule you can build on. Mueller has said before that Google hasn’t defined the behavior, and that whatever anyone figures out about how Google does it today isn’t necessarily how it will work tomorrow.
The idea keeps circulating anyway. SEJ’s Roger Montti covered a similar worry about anchor text dilution last April.
What Google Sees
Google can run JavaScript, but that doesn’t mean it treats everything clickable as a link. A link written the normal way puts the address inside a link tag, which tells Google where it goes. An address parked in some other element for a script to grab isn’t written as a link at all.
Google’s links best practices documentation says Google can generally only crawl a link when it’s an element with an href attribute, and that it can’t reliably extract URLs from elements that behave like links through script events.
So the button doesn’t turn into a link with its words hidden; it stops being a link. The…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
