This week’s Ask an SEO question comes from an anonymous user:
“Should we still publish high volumes of content, or is it better to invest in fewer, higher-authority evergreen pieces?”
Great question! The answer is always higher-authority content, but not always evergreen if your goal is growth and sustainability. If the goal is quick traffic and a churn-and-burn model, high volume makes sense. More content does not mean more SEO. Sustainable SEO traffic via content is providing a proper user experience, which includes making sure the other topics on the site are helpful to a user.
Why High Volumes Of Content Don’t Work Long Term
The idea of creating high volumes of content to get traffic is a strategy where you focus a page on specific keywords and phrases and optimize the page for these phrases. When Google launched BERT and MUM, this strategy (which was already outdated) got its final nail in the coffin. These updates to Google’s systems looked at the associations between the words, hierarchy of the page, and the website to figure out the experience of the page vs. the specific words on the page.
By looking at what the words mean in relation to the headers, the sentences above and below, and the code of the page, like schema, SEO moved away from keywords to what the user will learn from the experience on the page. At the same time, proactive SEOs focused more heavily on vectors and entities; neither of these are new topics.
Back in the mid-2000s, article spinners helped to generate hundreds of keyword-focused pages quickly and easily. With them, you create a spintax (similar to prompts for large language models or LLMs like ChatGPT and Perplexity) with macros for words to be replaced, and the software would create “original” pieces of content. These could then be launched en masse, similar to “programmatic SEO,” which is not new and never a smart idea.
Google and other search engines would surface these and rank the sites until they got caught. Panda did a great job finding article spinner pages and starting to devalue and penalize sites using this technique of mass content creation.
Shortly after, website owners began using PHP with merchant data feeds to create shopping pages for specific products and product groups. This is similar to how media companies produce shopping listicles and product comparisons en masse. The content is unique and original (for that site), but is also being produced en masse, which usually means little to no value. This includes human-written content that is then used for comparisons, even when a user selects to compare the two. In this situation, you’ll want to use canonical links and meta robots properly, but that’s for a different post.
Panda and the core algorithms already had a way to detect “thin pages” from content spinning, so although these product pages worked, especially when combined with spun content or machine-created content describing the products, these sites began…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
