Andy Burnham’s plan to scrap the government’s technology department has triggered an angry backlash from MPs, Whitehall officials and tech experts.
The incoming prime minister has asked officials to draw up plans to abolish the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology as part of a wider Whitehall shake-up.
The plans have not yet been signed off, but they are causing significant disquiet among experts inside and outside government.
The backlash comes amid concerns in the Labour party about some of Burnham’s early decisions, including the likely appointment of Shabana Mahmood as chancellor.
Matt Clifford, an adviser on AI to the outgoing prime minister, Keir Starmer, and his predecessor, Rishi Sunak, posted on X: “This would be a big mistake. Right now is a critical moment for tech as an economic and national security issue. Tying up our most senior science and tech officials in a [reorganisation] wastes time and energy that’s desperately needed for the actual substance.”
One Labour MP referred to the plans as “getting rid of the department of the future”.
Sources familiar with the plans have told the Guardian Burnham’s advisers asked officials to work up plans to hand over much of science and technology policy to a more powerful business department, to be led by the chief whip, Jonathan Reynolds.
Responsibility for overseeing the use of AI in the public sector would be given to the cabinet secretary, Antonia Romeo, rather than a minister.
People within the technology sector have reacted with alarm, saying AI and advanced technology are likely to dominate many of the government’s policy decisions over the next few years.
Yvette Cooper, the foreign secretary, recently said she thought AI would be the major foreign policy question of the next two years.
In a speech last year, Starmer called AI “the defining opportunity of our generation”.
AI enthusiasts point to the success of the British company DeepMind, which was bought by Google in 2014, as evidence the UK can play a global role in the sector.
Others, however, say the recent US tech deal signed by Starmer shows the British AI industry is at risk of turning into a subsidiary of the American tech sector.
Dom Hallas, the executive director of the Startup Coalition, posted on X: “Changes to DSIT (which I’ve been getting calls about) would be a mistake.”
He added: “A mega [business] department would mean British tech competing with British steel for attention. And waste 6 months reorg-ing when time is of the essence. Not good.”
Barney Hussey-Yeo, a technology investor, said he was sad about the possible closure.
“The UK has a major competitive advantage in its scientific capacity,” he said on X. “Turning that strength into economic power – DSIT’s job – would be my idée fixe as prime minister.”
Burnham’s team is finalising their plans for government over the weekend in preparation for Monday, when the MP for Makerfield will officially take over as prime…
Source link
Disclaimer
We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We blogs.grocliq.com want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.
Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at [email protected]
